The best method of profiling a rapist is to follow the standards developed by the Swiss Criminal Profiling Scientific Research Site specifically follow steps 1 through 4 (Criminal Profiling Research, Methods CPRM, 2008).   This essay addresses the first four Swiss-developed stages and suggests that the methods used are imperative to the development of a viable criminal rapist profile.  These methods are using the given evidence to map out the events and evidence of the crime(s) development of questions and noted observations of the crime(s) offender  and victim(s)s behavior and, the creation of a profile for concerned investigators.  What follows looks at these steps in chronological order, providing a description of each stage, evidence and informational services needed along the way, as well as a rational for sources required.

    Step One is the evidence of the crime mapping stage including any physical evidence, photographs of the crime scene, autopsy reports and pictures, witness testimony, , police reports, as well as a creation of victimology and graphic profiling (CPRM, 2008).  Victimology is a close look at who the victim was background information on the victim is important here.  Graphic profiling is an investigative aid that predicts the offenders most likely location, which includes their possible home and work locations, social venues or even travel routes (Criminal Profiling Research, Types CPRT, 2008).   In this stage, the evidence is either tangible and available, or first-hand knowledge, i.e., witnessing of the evidence.  As mentioned, the mapping of the evidence of the crime requires this tangible and first-hand evidence to be laid out, whether on a wall board or laid out on a table, so the profiler(s) can see the evidence and allow connections (similarities) or disconnections (differences) to be noted.  The rationalization to using this type of evidence (tangible) and information (first-hand reports) is because this evidence is absolute.  In other words, this evidence is there for the senses to experience, allowing the profiler(s) to get a tangible feeling for the crime(s).

    Step Two takes all of the evidence from Step One and now questions, from observations of Step One, are developed.  These questions address what is missing from the evidence what does not make sense, so why becomes the concern also, hows are asked about fitting certain pieces of evidence together, i.e., how did the rapist know what time the victim walked down the trail  Other questions posed or concerns raised in this stage are the type of crime.  Here rapist typology is applied.  Is the rapist power reassured (less violent), power assertive (possessing an extreme sense of superiority and entitlement) anger retaliatory (a rapist who wants to cause pain) or an anger excited (sadistic) rapist (a killer) (Forensic Talk A Forensic Nurses Weblog, 2006).    Hypotheses are also used to created possible motives for the crime(s) and to look at the sequences of the rapists actions, as well as events of the crime.  Think of Step Two as the brainstorming or brain theory of development stage.  This stage deals with the intangible, using tangible evidence from Step One, and other information services such as public data sources, profiler and investigator practical experience(s), clinical studies, and statistical models (Hammond, n.d.).  The rationalization behind these sources is to use recognized experience(s) and collected knowledge to authenticate the evidence and ideas developed out of Step One.

Step Three delves further into the brain or psyche of the offender and his victim(s) (Forensic Talk, 2006).  Building on what is known of the physical evidence and using the extensive knowledge base from Step Two, this stage asks further more complicated and complex questions about the crime.  Is the offender disorganized asocial (male offender completely disorganized with everything) or organized nonsocial (a loner, compulsive, extremely organized with everything) (CPRM, 2008).  What has been revealed about the rapist in the way he attacks, harms, or even kills his victim(s)  Is there staging of the body, and if so, what is the killer saying with this behavior  Is the victim a part of a fantasy a retribution for past harms done to the rapist a statement toward society or the police or does it have other patterns that make it unique to other rape-based crimes  This stage also takes place in the brain while using the same evidence and information services from Stage Two.  The difference here is that different view points are addressed in looking at the evidence, as well as further analysis of the evidence, tangible and intangible, are addressed.  The rationalization of this stage is to step into the head of the offender and his victim(s).  By knowing the victim(s) the profiler can begin to relate to what attracted the offender to them, and by knowing the offender the profiler can begin to understand who they are and what they might do next.

The final stage is the development of a criminal profile which is released to the investigators of the crime in hopes of helping them to apprehend the rapist.  Here sex, age (hardest to determine because emotional or experiential age does not always match chronological years), race, marital status, living arrangements and employment history psychological characteristics, beliefs and values, as well as past criminal records, and a prediction of potential reactions upon arrest are all created (CRPM, 2008).  This stage also goes through a thorough feedback loop, whereby profilers check their predictions, making sure that their profile is a strong one (CRPM, 2008).  Through the information used and developed from Step One through Three, this stage is a fine tuning of the profile that is to be prepared as a written document for the investigators of the concerned rapist.  The rational behind this stage is to create a picture of the rapist for the investigators.  It is also the opportunity to proofread and edit the final draft of who the rapist is.  This stage completes the best organizational structure that is to be used when building a criminal profile of a rapist.
The motto of the citys police department would be Defend lives and rights. To effectively accomplish this and cater to the needs of the community, there should enough number of police officers in the department. As the city has a population of approximately 18,000 citizens, 50 police officers are needed to maintain a healthy police-to-population ratio of 1 360 (Police Structure and Organization). While the salaries police officers vary from 30,000 - 45,000 based on their qualification and specialization, the salaries of higher police officials such as captains and lieutenants would be in the range of 50,000 - 70,000. Therefore, the total cost of compensating all the officers in the police department would be around 2.8 million per year. The yearly premium of insuring all the police officers in the department would cost another 130,000. 

The citys police department would be split into four major divisions the north, south, east and west precincts would be located at strategic locations to ensure that the department is accessible to citizens across the city. The budget should accommodate costs incurred in procuring supplies for these four facilities which would serve as offices for the citys police department. A designer will have to be hired to design the officers badge and uniform. Care has to be taken to ensure that the uniform is comfortable as well as dignified to command the respect of the public. While this will cost about 15000, an additional cost of about 65,000 will be incurred in procuring footwear, batons, handcuffs, flashlights, night-vision goggles, holsters and other office supplies for the officers.

The Chief of police would head the citys police department, while the captains of various departments would report to the chief (Los Angeles Police Department 1). The lieutenants of each unit in turn would be answerable to their department captain. Each lieutenant would be responsible for marshalling the detectives and police officers under his command. The SWAT (special weapons and tactics) taskforce is a critical unit that averts disaster through the use of specialized machinery. A computer expert will also have to be deployed to combat cyber crime and gauge online threats of terrorism. While an animal trainer will be deployed to train dogs in the canine unit, a pilot will be recruited to fly the departments helicopter. Other support staffs in the department include receptionists, artists that draw sketches of suspects, clerks responsible for safely storing evidence and forensic experts that analyze evidence (City of Brooklyn Park Police Department 1).

In todays electronic age, the police department would require a website that would help interact with the people of the city. This website could serve as a feedback mechanism as it would be instrumental in collecting suggestion and comments from the general public. It would also serve as a notice board that makes the citizens aware of safety measures, achievements and threats assessed by the department. It could also list the phone numbers of police officers to simplify the communication process. The cost of developing and maintaining the website would come to 5000.

The department would need computers to store and recover data pertaining to criminal records and database of previous crimes. Computers are also an essential tool for conducting forensic research. Other IT functions include document imaging and maintaining an intranet for the department. The total cost of installing computer systems will reach about 55,000. Other electronic equipment such as tracking devices, lie detectors and recording equipment are the critical to process of acquiring evidence, investigating and capturing law offenders. A card-access system will also have to be put in place to restrict access to the police departments premises. The cost of acquiring these electronic devices would total to approximately 250,000.    

While the duty of police officers is to primarily protect citizens, sometimes weapons such machines guns, pistols and tasers are required to immobilize violent offenders. These budgeting of weapons needs to be carefully planned, as purchasing excess of weapons would be prove to be a futile exercise while shortage of weapons spells disaster. The cost of buying weapons should work out to 350,000. The procurement of safety equipment such as mob-control gear, bullet-proof vests, bomb-diffusion kits, gas masks, metal detectors, fire-extinguishers and first-aid kits are also equally critical. These devices are expensive and could cost up to 150,000. However, they are worth as they help protect invaluable lives and uphold order by preventing riots from getting out of hand. Care should also be taken to ensure that weapon contracts are given to the right companies. Internal affairs should be on the lookout for irregularities as these contracts invite a lot of bribes and favoritism. 

Choosing a hybrid vehicle as a squad car has many strategic advantages. It gains the publics respect by sending out the message that the police department is environment-conscious. It also helps in cutting down fuel costs on the long run. Eight Nissan Altima Hybrids and Eight Toyota Prius cars would be purchased to serve as squad cars for police officers. In addition to the sixteen squad cars, four Ford Explorer SUVs would also be purchased for the department to navigate through rough terrain in the outer limits of the city. This pushes the total cost of vehicles to 520,000.

Two officers would share a car while patrolling the streets. Six Honda VFR motorcycles costing a total of 90,000 would also be purchased in order to help police officers move quickly through traffic during accidents and traffic jams. It can also be used while performing security duty for dignitaries and important politicians that visit the city. The importance of buying a helicopter for the police department is manifold. It would be essential while carrying out searches of missing people and pursing a suspect during a chase. Thus, a R44 Raven I helicopter equipped with night vision, surveillance cameras, radar system, tear gas dispensers and searchlights, flashing light beacons, winches and winch cables would be purchased for about by 333,000 by the police department (Robinson Helicopters Company 1).

The police department would also have four well-trained horses, one at each precinct, to add a touch of elegance to the department. The police department would also be deployed with eight German Shepherds and two Bloodhounds in its canine unit. These dogs are specially trained to sniff blood and drugs, thereby helping officers perform their jobs (Moore 2). In addition to these ten canines, the SWAT team will have four separate German Shepherds trained to sniff bombs.

Just like any other organization, the primary challenge while starting a new police department is to hire talented police officers. The hiring process involves interviewing candidates that have passed psychological evaluation, physical fitness tests and competitive civil service exams. Following recruitment, the next crucial step is training. This includes briefing on job duties, code of conduct as well as standard operating procedures. Training happens on the job as a new officer is paired with an experienced officer. Off the job training occurs when special workshops are conducted to help officers in using weapons, investigation methods, studying suspects cues and psychological profile. Resource management and leadership training will also have to be provided to captains and lieutenants to improve the functioning of their teams. Due to the nature of the job, police officers are usually encouraged to attend seminars on stress management and other forms of psychological counseling. The training process is likely to cost the department about 120,000.
Conducting community outreach programs such as clean streets, anti-drug campaigns and joint police community partnership are essential to gain public support. The internal affairs department is necessary to investigate and weed out misconduct in the police department, which is again critical to maintain a healthy public perception. Arranging award ceremonies to recognize and honor officers that excel in their jobs is necessary to maintain the morale of law-enforcement officers. These non-critical functions would cost the department about 110,000. The total amount of expenses incurred in starting up the new police department amounts to just over 5 million, which is within the allocated budget of 5.1 million. This would mean that the remaining money left can be saved up for contingencies.

Policing Innovations and Issues in the 21st Century

     American policing has experienced a period of significant evolution and innovation in the 21st Century. Many claim that this era of change is the most dramatic one in the history of policing. Everybody is aware that it is the duty of law enforcers to control crime and maintain peace and order in the society by providing wide range of services to the public. Prior to the dawn of technological advances, the police do not have enough resources to keep up with their increasing workload and this major set-back put them and the civilians in an extremely vulnerable position. Today, the advent of technology made it possible for the police to do their job more efficiently and effectively. All of the developments that happened in the police force enabled the law enforcers to communicate with each other in a proficient and cost efficient manner.

    Nowadays, police agencies are relying greatly in the help of technological innovations to assist them in solving crimes. Everybody is amazed by the fast-paced technological innovations that have been happening such as the advances in crime mapping and the use and discovery of DNA in crime investigations. These discoveries made life safer and easier for both the police and the civilians. Crime scene investigation was one of the many subjects that police are training for and this is one of the areas the demand technological upgrade.

    The development of gadgets such as the of the two-way radio, telegraph and patrol car computers helped the law enforcers do their jobs with more accuracy, speed and efficiency not only the aspect of crime scene investigations but also when it comes to their daily functions. The use of the two way radio is very common in patrol cards. It is called as such because it is capable of transmitting and receiving signals and unlike an ordinary radio, the two way radios permit a person to speak into a station while sending messages from that station to other radio users in the vicinity. Police scanner codes are short term words or abbreviations that are used by law enforcers to communicate through their radio in cases of emergency. These codes enable the police to send data about their present situation quickly. These codes make use of the police scanners that act as radio receivers in tuning and scanning frequencies (Khara).

    The police cars come in great handy every time someone is in need of assistance. Police use their cars to patrol the locality, to chase the suspects, to restrain offenders and today, it is also used to communicate with fellow police officers. The modern police cars have two-way radios, computers for monitoring and high powered engines for emergency chases (Grabianowski). In Delray Beach, the installation of computers in police patrol vehicles have greatly lessened the time that the officers spend in performing their routine works like the writing of traffic tickets and police reports. This virtual planner program produced 84 increase in the traffic stops and criminal citations. Not only that, the average time they they spent on a traffic stop decreased from 25 minutes to 15 minutes. This virtual planner has a voice developer that verbally relays the information as a response to the questions entered by the police. The voice response  gives the officer exact information as to the tag and status of the drivers license as well as the color, type and model of the vehicle. This confirms the warrant hits by sending a signal an audible alert signal to the police. It also enables an officer to keep his focus on both the offender and the vehicle without a need to look at the computer screen thereby eliminating distractions and increasing police safety ( Innovations in Policing ).

    Police cars and radios are not the only tool that law enforcement have to combat crime. Today, there is also a crime solving robot that exists and is named Arturito. It was first used in Chile in order to scan a farmhouse for a business mans dead body. Within two hours, the robot has already pinpointed the place where the body was buried. The robot was also able to discover buried treasures and it also sniffs out land mines. The Leica Geosystems laser scanner has the capability to scan and photograph a crime scene quickly. In 2004, the highway patrol in California use this equipment to disprove the claim of a driver that his brakes faded before slamming into Volkswagen and killed the other driver ( Busted 10 Awesome Technology-Assisted Police Cases ).

    The high-tech equipments that police departments have been using to carry out surveillance minimizes the occurrence of injuries and puts them out of danger. For instance, the iRobot Negotiator is a devise used by Orland SWAT team has a camera so that the police can see what the robot sees. The robot can climb the stairs, deliver packages and carry out surveillances and this qualities helps police operations a lot. According to an officer, the key in handling these gadgets is knowing when to use and when not to use them. Law enforcers are often being introduced to new technological developments. They are being given headsets that picks up what the wearer is saying by reading the vibrations in the jawbones. According to FBI Secret Service, todays environment leaves everyone with no choice but to move forward. However, Sergeant Canty is of the view that despite the wondrous contributions that technology brought, it also has drawbacks. Deploying these gadgets sometimes slow his team because no matter how advanced these tools are, they are no substitute to human skill. Technology must be perceived as a supplement that helps the police do their jobs better but what is indispensable are the good qualities of the officers who must run these machines (  Police Using More High-Tech Gadgets ).

    Due to the changing of the times, there is an increasing need for the cops to be much smarter in order to catch the bad guys because it is not surprising to find out that the criminals have turned this positive innovation to their advantage. The challenge that law enforcers are facing today and in the future is the fact that the advancement of technology also made the criminals more sophisticated and up to date with what to do to escape and avoid being caught. They too, have come to terms with high tech gadgets thereby making their crimes more technologically enhanced.   This dilemma puts more pressure on law enforcement to keep remodeling and changing their tactics. Familiarizing themselves with the genre of crimes that the criminals are perpetuating is among the primary responsibility of these police men who are engaged in public service (Foster). This challenge teaches the police force in the country never to be complacent with their current position because the safety and security of the general public lies in their hands.

History of Law Enforcement

The word law enforcement is mostly associated with police forces of a state that have the authority to apply the police power of that state within a definite territory. A police service is a public force that is given the power by law to offer security by legitimate utilization of force. Law enforcement only comprises a part of policing duty. Since the beginning of society, law enforcement institutions have been in place for protecting the public from criminals or to keep justice and order and keep the leaders in power. Even in the biblical time there were military officials who were specially trained to observe peace and order (Annely, Para 1).  The world has for a long time established police forces some organized, and others temporary. From the ancient time to the modern society, law enforcement has gone through a lot of transformation. The paper seeks to trace the establishment of law enforcement from the ancient days to present.

Law enforcement in the ancient world
    In Ancient china, law enforcement was implemented by prefects. The prefecture system was established in Chu and Jin kingdoms. The prefects were government officials chosen by local magistrates, who were chosen by the head of state. The head of state was usually the emperor of the dynasty. The prefects were in charge of civil administration of their jurisdiction. They usually reported cases to local magistrates in the same way the current police report to judges. Some prefects were in charge of investigation just like the current police detectives do. The concept eventually spread to Korea and Japan (Bolick, p. 31).

    In the Roman Empire, the army offered protection rather than the organized police departments. Local watchmen were deployed to offer extra security. In Rome, there were urban cohorts that oversaw law and order and were sort of organized police department. There were no public prosecution, therefore the victims or their relatives organized the punishment (Zifcak, p. 12).

    In Europe, the current police originate from the Hermandades or brotherhoods peacekeeping organizations of armed people as was in municipal style in medieval Spain. The protective municipal leagues began to come up in the 12th century to protect people against criminals. The municipals were meant to be temporary but became a permanent feature in Spain. The first recorded case of Hermand was when the people of the north came together to offer protection to the pilgrims against robber knights on the road to Santiago de Compostela in Galicia. After the war of succession, Holy Brotherhood was formed as a national police force (Roth  Olson, p. 23). 

    The fist police force in France with a modern touch was the one formed by King Louis XIV in 1667. The royal decree passed by the parlement of Paris in March 1667 established the office of the lieutenant general of police head of the new police force. The system of the Paris police force was spread out to the rest of France by royal decree of October 1699.  After the French Revolution, Napoleon reorganized the Paris police force and formed the first uniformed police force in the world. The force was known as city sergeant (Zifcak, p. 22).

    In England, a scheme of sheriffs, reeves and investigative juries came up. In the UK, the development of law enforcement was much slower than the other parts of Europe. In Britain the role of police was performed by watchmen and thief-takers. The term police was adopted from French into the English language in the 18th century. In June 1800, the government finally passed the Glasgow Police Act establishing the City of Glasgow police. Other Scottish towns soon started establishing their own police departments (Bolick, P.34).

    In the olden days, policing in the US was very poor with poorly resourced sheriffs and temporary organized poses. In the United States, the US Marshals Service was created in 1789. This was followed by other federal services like US Parks Police in 1791 and US Mint Police in 1791. The initial city police departments were formed in Richmond, VA in1807, Boston in 1838 and Philadelphia in 1854. After the civil war, police departments became more Para-military, with increase in use of uniform and arms (Roth  Olson, p. 23). 

Important milestones in law enforcement from 14th century
From 1377 to 1453 there was the Hundred Years War leading to the formation of French Gendarmerie. In 1626, the New York City Sheriffs office was established the office had a sheriff appointed to the position by the mayor. The first country to employ the services of paid law enforcers was London in 1663. King Louis XIV formed the pioneer police force in 1667. Henry Fielding established Bow Street Runners in London in 1749. In July of 1789, the Paris police force was broken up at the beginning of French Revolution and the police duties were done by National Guard and Gendarmerie.  In 1789, the US Marshall Service was formed.

In 1800, the authorities of Glasgow in Scotland established the City of Glasgow Police and the same year the Paris Police was reestablished by Napoleon. In March 1829, the first uniformed police was established in France through a decree by the French government. The police service was known as city sergeants. The Metropolitan Police Act was passed in parliament in 1829 establishing the pioneer civil police force, London Metropolitan Police and the model employed by variety of countries today. This includes the United States of America. Out of the United Kingdom, the initial police service to be established was Gibraltar Police in 1830. Toronto Police was formed in Canada in 1834. This was one of the pioneer police departments in North America. Boston Police Department was the initial full-time police department in the United States formed in 1839 (Annely, Para 3).

Establishment of modern police forces was contemporary to the establishment of states. The increase in criminal activities could not be contained without development of state and city law enforcement departments. Since their establishment, the law enforcement offices have played a key role in maintaining law and order. 

Internal Affairs within a Police Department

The internal affairs office of a police department is designed to ensure proper conduct and obedience to the law from all police officers on the force. Those working within this department are responsible for investigating any suspicion of lawbreaking or misconduct from those working for the police department. They are also in charge of making sure all officers on the force are informed of new regulations and that those regulations are followed and maintained. Because of the sensitive nature of the cases involved within the internal affairs office, individuals most often report all findings directly to the chief or head personnel of the police department.

    It is important that a police department have within it a working internal affairs office. This helps ensure that there are no cops gone bad operating within the department. Any suspicion of foul play from an officer can be reported to the internal affairs office anonymously or in person depending on the department. Some police stations have online web complaint forms available as well. It is important to note that a complaint can be filed by a member of the police force or by a citizen of the community. There are some police departments that have chosen to allow private citizens within the community to sit on the board or on a committee of the internal affairs office to help ensure there are no biases in the review of each case.

    As seen on television shows such as Law and Order, some internal affairs offices and their employees are referred to as the rat squad because of the nature of their work. No police officer wants to investigate a fellow officer and find the individual guilty of breaking the law, violating employment codes, and most of all hurting the reputation of the department. However, this position is vital to ensure the checks and balance system of those enforcing the law. Citizens are often reassured and hold their local police department at a higher level of respect just knowing there is an internal affairs office working to ensure everyone in the department and in the community whether guilty or innocent is treated fairly.

Personal Statement for Admission to Doctoral Studies

Like every other aspect of the globalized world we live in today, crime has advanced to a point that calls for detailed expert intervention to unravel the motivation behind it. Over the years, crime has revolutionalised yet respective authorities have not kept to the pace in combating crime. Many reasons are attributed to the rise in crime but few have been justified and this means that more has to be done lest crime renders all the achievements of this age useless. Perhaps one reason why crime has grown that much is lack of appropriate expertise to keenly study and devise methods of dealing with crime rather than just enforcement of the law. Understanding the mechanisms behind crime is paramount in combating crime. Being so rampant, crimes are varied and thus expert specialization would be an appropriate move to effectively tackle each type of crime. A problem identified is half solved, hence the reason why I believe that excellent knowledge in criminology would help me to produce reliable statistics and data to assist the law in specifically addressing cyber and human trafficking crimes. It is this realization and the passion I have for Criminal Justice studies that make me believe that   doctoral studies in Criminology would help greatly in solving the mysteries of crime across the world and thus I will have made the World a better and a crime free place.
    My drive for criminology studies draws a lot from the vast experience I have from crime related fields that I have worked in. Thorough evaluation of my career goal right from my junior school years, led me to choose criminal justice since crime is the worst enemy of the human race. In high school I was actively involved in leadership for instance, I was the students Council secretary and this gave me a sense of responsibility which has made me want to pursue criminology to assert my responsibility to human well being. In my undergraduate studies, I majored in Psychology and Economics as a strategy to prepare myself for a career as a professor of Criminal justice. This Social science course introduced me to the study of human behavior which would be necessary in approaching world cyber and human trafficking issues if only reinforced with a doctoral degree in criminal justice. Throughout my undergraduate course I focused on defining my interest in criminology studies by actively participating in research activities and later I succeeded in getting an admission for a Master of Science degree in Criminal Justice immediately after completing the undergraduate course.
The master course was yet another eye opener in my pursuit for a fulfilling career in Criminal Justice. It is during this course that I felt that I would rather focus on passing on knowledge to others while serving as a professor of criminal justice. This is because through a doctoral degree I would gain excellent research and teaching skills which I could use effectively in preparing a pool of Criminal Justice experts to successfully tackle crime at various categories for a safer today and tomorrow. I have skills in criminology and a passion which I am limited to practice fully at my desired capacity due to my education level.  
Research and statistics are my preferences in this pursuit for a career in Criminal Justice. Following this drive, I have more than often been involve in crime related research work thus I have been able to gather the necessary skills in researching, data collection and analysis methods to suit my dream career of enhancing teaching and researching skills in criminology. The same research has given me a glimpse of what aspects of the criminal justice systems across the world that fails to deliver such that crime is rising at such an alarming rate. I have solid experience in research gained during both my undergraduate and master courses and these skills can only be applied effectively at a doctoral education level. I am specifically well versed in general descriptive and inferential statistical analyses such as Chi-square correlations Lambda Cramers V Spearmans Rho gamma t-test cross-tabs multiple regressions and many others.   
As a research student, I developed a better understanding of the different human personalities which would be helpful in approaching criminal studies during this doctoral course. Since April, 2009 until now I have been working as a research assistant in the Universitys department of Criminal Justice and I have been doing this to develop strong skills in statistics and research which are integral in doctoral studies. This has helped me to focus on personal development so as to be the most resourceful professor in criminal Justice studies. I have had a chance to deal with trafficking and smuggling issues between the United States and Korea and I have been able to develop a strong foundation for doctoral focus on cyber crime and human trafficking cases. From the various analysis I have done, I have noticed that expert knowledge is lacking in resolving criminal, law and human rights issues and this has deteriorated given the fact of late, little expertise is directed to criminal justice.
To widen my base for criminal justice studies, I have been involved in various criminal justice professional bodies and activities which have really challenged my level of education as a drawback to my capacity to deliver. I was actively involved in the Korean Criminology Associations conference committee which proved to me that I could have done more had I been in possession of doctoral skills in criminal justice. I have sought membership in various criminal justice professional bodies to give me a foundation and a better glimpse of crime cases and this I believe will be very helpful in research and recommendations regarding crime. However, the only limitation for this is my education level and hence the reason why I have decided to pursue a doctoral degree in criminal justice and thus successfully serve humanity. As a member of, the Korean Criminal Association of America (USA), Korean Criminal Association, and the Society of Advanced Criminal Investigation, I have come to the realization that doctoral expert knowledge is paramount in resolving crime. Despite the skills and experience I hold, I require more skills to be one of those providing this required expertise and this can only be possible after pursuing a doctorate course in criminal justice which would help me know more concerning international human rights, international criminal law, research methods and statistics in criminal justice.
I possess excellent computer skills which have enabled me to survey the potential threat of cyber crime to humanity. This vast knowledge would also be helpful in my future endeavor as a professor of criminal justice in resolving cyber crime issues. Following my interest in research and statistics, I have been able to develop excellent computer-based research skills in quantitative and qualitative research programs such as SPSS, SAS and ATLAS respectively. I also have thorough knowledge of all Microsoft office aspects which would help greatly in cyber crime research and statistics not only in my doctoral studies but also in my career in crime justice. I am conversant with a number of languages such as Korean, English, Japanese and Chinese which would help a lot in the understanding of criminal justice from a wider perspective. After evaluating my achievements and goals in life, I have identified the lack of doctoral skills as the only inhibiting factor towards what I feel obliged to achieve. I am looking forward to learn with you.     

Ethical and Unethical Behaviors in Organizations

Unethical behaviors in organizations are generated and caused by a variety of factors. Very often, a misbalanced organizational culture and the lack of ethical commitment in organizations lay the foundation for the development and encouragement of unethical behaviors. The LAPD Rampart Scandal is the bright example of how unethical behaviors undermine the reputation and image of law enforcement and criminal justice agencies. The LAPD Rampart Scandal became the turning point in the development of the new ethical vision in criminal justice agencies. Apart from the fact that the scandal was the direct product of a violent organizational culture based on aggression and self-interest, the scandal also proved that fighting these behaviors is impossible without a profound organizational transformation and increased civilian support.

Ethical and Unethical Behaviors in Organizations

    Unethical behaviors in organizations are generated and caused by a variety of factors. Very often, a misbalanced organizational culture and the lack of ethical commitment in organizations lay the foundation for the development and encouragement of unethical behaviors. The LAPD Rampart Scandal is the bright example of how unethical behaviors undermine the reputation and image of law enforcement and criminal justice agencies. The LAPD Rampart Scandal became the turning point in the development of the new ethical vision in criminal justice agencies. Apart from the fact that the scandal was the direct product of a violent organizational culture based on aggression and self-interest, the scandal also proved that fighting these behaviors is impossible without a profound organizational transformation and increased civilian support.
The LAPD Rampart Scandal The Background of the Issue
    The year 2000 was marked with one of the largest scandals in criminal justice the Los Angeles City Council voted to pay a sum of 15 million to Javier Ovando who had been shot by the two LAPD officers (PBS, 2008). In addition, 29 lawsuits regarding corruption and unethical behaviors at the LAPD unit were awarded 11 million, with 140 more lawsuits waiting for their logical resolution (PBS, 2008). That was the culmination and the beginning of an end in the notorious history of the LAPD Unit and its CRASH team. For many years, professional policemen and criminal justice professionals terrorized the local population, trying to hide behind its mission to work in partnership with all of the diverse residential and business communities of the City (Peak, 2002). Later, the mission turned into a set of empty phrases which did not serve the needs of the diverse LA communities but, on the contrary, were used as a shield behind which the LAPD professionals were hiding the signs and the consequences of their ethical misconduct. The culture at the LAPD was the major factor responsible for the ethical scandal that followed the lack of managerial oversight, the distorted vision of leadership, and the exaggerated sense of self-worth were later identified as the major impulses in unethical behaviors among the LAPD police professionals.
The LAPD Rampart Scandal Assessing the Organizational Culture
    Generally, the CRASH was a group of elite anti-gang units within the LAPD set up to tackle increasing gang-related crime (PBS, 2008). One of the major tasks was to get the CRASH members into the streets, closer to gang members and their leaders, and to monitor the gang activity on a daily basis for the purposes of deterrence. Unfortunately, since the very first days at the CRASH, neither leaders nor its members had been prepared to promote an ethical organizational culture. With the emphasis on the best of the best, and trying to expand the boundaries of appropriate behaviors with gang members, the CRASH department at the LAPD was soon characterized by a complex combination of corruption, overwhelming permissibility, the lack of managerial control, and the growing sense of self-worth in its members. Even that all members of the CRASH unit had to wear the same vests and to have the same tattoos which distinguished them from other police officers was the sign of the growing organizational consolidation, in which the lack of ethics was the determining feature, which everyone had to follow (PBS, 2008).
    Rampart was always considered to have a unique way of doing things (PBS, 2008). Formally, that unique way of doing things implied the lack of effective leadership and the lack of managerial oversight. Since the very first days, in their majority the CRASH team had been illegal immigrants from the Central and the South America, who had a vision of crime different from that in the U.S. and who also did not want to change the order of things in their department (PBS, 2008). In the middle of the 1950s, with Bill Parker being the LAPD Chief, proactive and even aggressive policing became the central instrument of crime deterrence at the LAPD (Peak, 2002). That was a kind of paramilitary culture, which favored aggressive violent attitudes toward those, who were at the other side of the crime barricade. One of the major elements of the organizational culture at the LAPD and the CRASH team was their leaders desire to protect their agency and their employees in any situation, regardless of whether ethical or unethical that situation could be (Peak, 2002). More often than not, the new leaders at the LAPD, no matter how effective they were, either had to comply with the already established cultural principles or to give up their positions. As a result, the CRASH team operated in its small world with its own rules and standards of conduct, and with its own vision of management and control.
    The lack of managerial supervision and oversight was another critical element of culture at the CRASH. This particular Rampart unit was in a building away from the main station because of space problems, without supervision (PBS, 2008), and while one of the mottos within the department was to intimidate those who were to intimidate (PBS, 2008), officers in the CRASH unit knew that they would not be held accountable for their possibly unethical behaviors. The autonomous unit with its autonomous culture in a building autonomous from the rest of the criminal justice system and the rest of the world made it possible for the police officers to effectively conceal or openly ignore the growing flood of complaints, which resulted of excessive use of force, injuries, and legal violations (PBS, 2008). All those cultural controversies were further heated by corruption, power, and racism, and the Us vs. Them philosophy divided the world into the black and the white camps, which let the CRASH members discriminate against minority representatives and confirmed the unlimited authoritarian power of the CRASH members (Peak, 2002).
Unethical Behaviors at the LAPD and the CRASH Unit
    Under the influence of the misbalanced organizational culture and the lack of organizational managerial control, members of the CRASH Unit displayed a whole range of unethical behaviors, from corruption and racism, to officer-involved shootings and open violence against minorities. Apart from the fact that the CRASH Unit representatives sentenced minority individuals for the crimes which they had never committed, they actively involved in brutality and aggression against those, who were not considered to be a part of their society. Those included homosexuals, pornographers, and Blacks (Peak, 2002). Such discrimination was a tool of establishing an authoritarian and omnipotent image of the CRASH Unit and its members and to give them unlimited opportunities for exercising their power, which in no way favored the establishment of a peaceful order in the local community but, on the contrary, undermined conventional social values and turned criminal justice into a continuous bloody fight.
The LAPD Rampart Scandal Evaluating the Response
    The public recognition of the scandal became the starting point in the development of the new police vision at the LAPD. Gang approaches promoted by the CRASH Unit gave place to other, more civic-minded programs (Gottlieb, Freer  Vallianatos, 2006). In many aspects, the LAPD itself behaved like a large gang, and with numerous police accountability organizations involved, the LAPD vision was transformed to restore its legitimacy and to develop societys trust in police (Gottlieb, Freer  Vallianatos, 2006). A number of public reforms were initiated to establish civilian control over the LAPD and to track off possible incidents of unethical conduct. However, despite their relative effectiveness, all those initiatives had to be further complemented with an effective system of ethical education within the department  the element, which had to develop a new ethical awareness in the LAPD members. Needless to say that officers can only be counted as good when they use their characteristic skills in the right way, and for the right ends (Peak, 2002). As a result, unethical behaviors in organizations such as criminal justice agencies are always in need for a profound organizational transformation, without which combating ethical violations becomes impossible. The LAPD scandal shows as a relatively successful example of an organizational transformation, which goes from the outside of the organization and is the result of the civilian pressure. This is the example of the transformation, which could have been more effective if the LAPD Unit applied to the benefits of continuous ethical education and testing at workplace.

    The year 2000 was marked with one of the most significant ethical scandals in criminal justice system. The LAPD Rampart scandal is fairly regarded the turning point in the development of new ethical visions in criminal justice. Misbalanced organizational culture, the lack of managerial oversight, authoritarian aggressive approaches to crime and the lack of accountability contributed to the development of unethical atmosphere in the CRASH Unit. Under the influence of profound transformations, the LAPD members were able to develop a new sense of trust in police. However, all those initiatives could have been more effective with a well-developed system of ethical education  the element, which similar organizations should consider as the tool of developing ethical awareness at all levels of their organizational performance.