Crime Analysis and Investigation
Diagnostic evidence is based on the likelihood of a hypothesis giving a more convincing stand on an issue. To cite an example, when two hypotheses are tabled, a comparison is made to determine which offers the best alternative to the problem.
Evaluating hypotheses to determine diagnostic value implies that hypotheses have been weighed against others and the best has been chosen. Un-diagnostic value hypothesis is that which has not been compared with competing hypotheses. Numeracy is of great value in determination of hypothetical issues. Using a diagnostic matrix approach is valuable as it helps anchor findings by giving them numerical support.
Picking the minuses in hypotheses is important as it helps come up with valid and reliable results. The removal of inconsistencies from hypothesis is what makes them valuable. The best way to evaluate evidence and hypotheses is through testing them by carrying out a study.
A shorthand thinking record helps save time when looking at research questions. A criminologist is faced with a host of questions like dealing with societal problems. This approach will help in these circumstances.
The ACH procedure is useful in helping make a choice regarding the best hypothesis. The process thus leads to adoption of reliable hypotheses. However, the process is time consuming and may require more resources to carry out.
0 comments:
Post a Comment