Criminology

Analyzing the value of Mertons claim concerning the value of opportunity and the capacity to commit crime, it can be argued that it presents itself as a good aspect in explaining the prevalence of crime within societies. However, it has its corresponding loopholes in terms of how it relates with the perspective of individuals and groups from the upper class. Seeing this dynamics, another perspective that corresponds to this process revolves around common interests. This element serves as the motivation of actions that often relates to the escalation of crime.

At the same time, social organizations and institutions seek to patronize such actions. Here, it takes consideration social status and power exhibited by individuals. Realizing this, to further legitimize the opportunities to reduce the crime rate, it is essential also to look into other dynamics that can support these interests. This can be made by legitimizing opportunities and making these available for people regardless of social standing.  Though this may not be applied fully, people must be given significant choices available within the community.

Similarly, there must also be recognition of limitations associated with every opportunity. In here, it recognizes that despite the social and economic disparities, appropriate conditions are still available even for the upper strata to follow. However, the challenge here remains on defining these parameters accordingly. Nevertheless, by trying to distinguish these corresponding limitations and creating a common purpose to address these things, social institutions can help stimulate directions leading towards change without the existence of bias.