One Canadian First Nation Communitys Efforts to Achieve Aboriginal Justice
Offenders, who volunteered to participate in the self-disclosure programmes were not prosecuted if they participated in the programme, were considered by the COC to be appropriate candidates after risk assessment, and if they fulfilled all the conditions of the programme. In 1993, a community referendum gave the COC the authority to implement the FVP (Pg. 170-171). For the programme to succeed, political will, co-operative agreements and trusts were required and with the communitys support, funding and co-operation of related government agencies were sought (Pg. 172). Community members participating in the programme expressed concern about a situation where everyone in the community owned up about their experience with sexual abuse since the joint release of emotion would be suicidal in proportion (Pg. 173). Conflict of confidentiality in circles where people knew each other or were related trust was an issue presented challenges. When the whole community did not participate, blame resulted where leaders and FVP staff who initiated the FVP but not the healing part, were questioned (Pg. 174-175). Community hesitation regarding the programme resulted in another survey which confirmed the communitys support of the programme. Positive changes were noted by most interviewees although usual success measures such as lowered crime rates were not applied (Pg. 177-179)
Conclusion
The FVL programme not only proved to be a tool for administering justice but it also showed that a crime is not just a violation of statute but of relationships in the community. The community overcame challenges to find justice while maintaining cohesion making the program a success.
0 comments:
Post a Comment