Criminology

(q1) Analyzing the application of apprehension in the interest of crime reduction, it can be argued that the principle surrounding this term corresponds to the ability of police discretion. Here, proper education, training is necessary to provide sound decision making and prevent opportunities for a biased or prejudiced way of arrests. Seeing this, it can be argued that this process remains difficult to reinforce unless formal and accepted patterns of rules are implemented accordingly by law enforcement agencies.

(q2) Similarly, there are also other ways that self-selection may eventuate. Here, it corresponds to the individual having a criminal background. At the same time, the process can also be applied to those who have been involved due to circumstances and are apprehended because they were there during the time of the crime. Also, such actions can also become existent to people who have been accused of false claims by others.

(q3) Recognizing the existence of repeat offenders, the idea presented illustrates the capacity of bias and double standard existing in the realm of policing and law enforcement. Here, due to the limited and rather low deterrent actions, people continuously seek to repeat the crime knowing that they can get away with it or just be punished lightly. Such tolerance to these offenses may prove to be detrimental in establishing control. At the same time, it can also insinuate the perspective of inequality as some offenses are favored while others are taken into consideration.